Creating Multiarch Containers
Windows Pods#
Ever since starting to work with with Kubernetes on Windows, I’ve been struggling with two problems
- Working with hybrid clusters
- An recurring error
no matching manifest for windows/amd64 {version} in the manifest list entries.
The issue with Windows is two-fold:
- Windows containers are locked to the OS version of the Host1
- Many community manifests or chart do not currently employ node selectors to force Pods onto matching nodes, meaning linux containers often try to run on Windows nodes2
This makes the experience for Windows Administrators or Developers pretty painful, especially when many Go binaries (common with Kubernetes services) can be cross compiled by using GOOS e.g. GOOS=windows
.
Manifest Lists#
Recently, I was introduced to the mighty Pause Image. This unassuming container is always around in kubernetes, acting as a temporary container while kubernetes prepares your application in a Pods and guess what it contains all the OS arch images you could ever ask for which, as of v3.4.1, will run on near enough any computer with a container runtime! Don’t believe me… run this on Windows and linux docker run k8s.gcr.io/pause:3.4.1
. How does this help us you ask?
Take a look at this docker manifest for the pause image
{
"schemaVersion": 2,
"mediaType": "application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.list.v2+json",
"manifests": [
{
"mediaType": "application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json",
"size": 526,
"digest": "sha256:c20822a0b1fb541515ebf0f432be0ed0158998cb33d42eb718089ee1bc6d7873",
"platform": {
"architecture": "amd64",
"os": "linux"
}
},
{
"mediaType": "application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json",
"size": 526,
"digest": "sha256:2bb63f004ed7a0f1549e1c293d9d87ff6089628f79ed4ce5710a339bf492e504",
"platform": {
"architecture": "arm",
"os": "linux",
"variant": "v7"
}
},
{
"mediaType": "application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json",
"size": 526,
"digest": "sha256:f2b9c1d3b6b9c96938827c1fdc745f91c9543da3a27e19c995797abc0c07a409",
"platform": {
"architecture": "arm64",
"os": "linux"
}
},
{
"mediaType": "application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json",
"size": 526,
"digest": "sha256:25bac98f63f75a3b999cfa6ca522eecf640dea57147402145243f76616af2e63",
"platform": {
"architecture": "ppc64le",
"os": "linux"
}
},
{
"mediaType": "application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json",
"size": 526,
"digest": "sha256:4917ee28ee62b645de3eb837948400403ef21a52b45ce30e216f29957aaf6c77",
"platform": {
"architecture": "s390x",
"os": "linux"
}
},
{
"mediaType": "application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json",
"size": 950,
"digest": "sha256:66452f92a567a06da93d81944ee02db30929e32087644d5ff282ace1218f7946",
"platform": {
"architecture": "amd64",
"os": "windows",
"os.version": "10.0.17763.1757"
}
},
{
"mediaType": "application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json",
"size": 950,
"digest": "sha256:da6fa3d6d66b5cf504ffd1a1d16f8d367bd6bd50f14cb69734ec7f16c5cb2eb1",
"platform": {
"architecture": "amd64",
"os": "windows",
"os.version": "10.0.18362.1256"
}
},
{
"mediaType": "application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json",
"size": 950,
"digest": "sha256:87b29346b4f3abfabb07335d64c5043bc1dcf1f9a202793a7b8d3c5b0cf36314",
"platform": {
"architecture": "amd64",
"os": "windows",
"os.version": "10.0.18363.1379"
}
},
{
"mediaType": "application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json",
"size": 950,
"digest": "sha256:528c5483f974f36d2f1a0f0716a7b6ec47f7dac24f18c9d4385273625c43d318",
"platform": {
"architecture": "amd64",
"os": "windows",
"os.version": "10.0.19041.804"
}
}
]
}
Even if you aren’t familiar with a docker manifest, you can may be able to tell that this is actually a manifest list, meaning that the docker image is actually a collection of seperate manifests, each built for a different architecture or in the case of windows different OS versions…
Now, you may expect that this means in our build pipeline we have a collection of computers to make this single image, which I guess you could do… but thankfully, with the magic of qemu and some docker trickery using something called buildx we can actually do this on one machine!
Enter buildx!#
Docker.com gives the following description of buildx “Docker Buildx is a CLI plugin that extends the docker command with the full support of the features provided by Moby BuildKit builder toolkit. It provides the same user experience as docker build with many new features like creating scoped builder instances and building against multiple nodes concurrently.”
In summary it’s a suped up docker build command that lets us use a mutli arch image to build images that wouldn’t usually be possible on our workstation or build server.
First we need 2 Dockerfiles one for Windows and one for linux, a program that can be cross compiled (in my example I am going to use Sonobuoy, a simple testing utility from VMware Tanzu) and a workstation setup to use docker. The Windows dockerfile cannot run any actual windows commans so RUN
is out of the question, but provided you have the components ready these can be injected using ADD
or COPY
.
The build process for pause is actually done by a Makefile but as that can be a little overwhelming to consume straight, I will break this down how this works using sonobuoy into single steps that will help you understand and replicate this for your applications. Let’s start with setting up our qemu image-builder and cloning our sonobuoy repo.
# Enable experimental docker CLI
export DOCKER_CLI_EXPERIMENTAL=enabled
# Create Qemu image builder
docker run --rm --privileged multiarch/qemu-user-static --reset -p yes
docker buildx create --name img-builder --use
docker buildx inspect --bootstrap
# Clone specific sonobuoy tag
mkdir -p $GOPATH/src/github.com/vmware-tanzu
cd $GOPATH/src/github.com/vmware-tanzu
git clone --branch v0.20.0 https://github.com/vmware-tanzu/sonobuoy.git
cd sonobuoy
# build the components
make clean
make build/windows/amd64/sonobuoy.exe
make build/linux/amd64/sonobuoy
make build/linux/arm64/sonobuoy
chmod +x build/linux/arm64/sonobuoy
chmod +x build/linux/amd64/sonobuoy
With this in place we can now start editing our Dockerfiles ready. For linux I am going to create images for amd64 and arm64, while for windows I am going to create an image for each version from 1809 to 20H2.
The Dockerfiles here are pretty simplistic examples but they serve the purpose for understanding the process and the only changes I am making are adding some build arguments to help me with reuse.
Dockerfile
ARG BASEIMAGE
FROM ${BASEIMAGE}
ARG ARCH
ADD /build/linux/${ARCH}/sonobuoy /sonobuoy
WORKDIR /
CMD ["/sonobuoy", "aggregator", "--no-exit", "-v", "3", "--logtostderr"]
Dockerfile_windows
ARG BASEIMAGE
FROM ${BASEIMAGE}
ADD build/windows/amd64/sonobuoy.exe /sonobuoy.exe
WORKDIR /
CMD /sonobuoy.exe aggregator --no-exit -v 3 --logtostderr
Next we will start with the getting my linux images built and pushed to my docker registry3. We also want to start to prepare a space sperated string containing a list of all of the iamges that we want to include in our manifest list.
# Use our image builder to build an image for linux/amd64
docker buildx build --pull --output=type=registry --platform linux/amd64 \
-t my-repo/my-sonobuoy:v0.20-linux-amd64 \
--build-arg ARCH="amd64" --build-arg BASEIMAGE="gcr.io/distroless/static-debian10:latest" \
-f Dockerfile .
# Add to our manifest list
MANIFESTLIST+="my-repo/sonobuoy:v0.20-linux-amd64 "
# Use our image builder to build an image for linux/arm64v8
docker buildx build --pull --output=type=registry --platform linux/arm64 \
-t my-repo/sonobuoy:v0.20-linux-arm64v8 \
--build-arg ARCH="arm64" --build-arg BASEIMAGE="arm64v8/ubuntu:16.04" \
-f Dockerfile .
# Add to our manifest list
MANIFESTLIST+="my-repo/sonobuoy:v0.20-linux-arm64v8 "
So far so good, but now comes the tricky part, creating windows images on a non-windows OS!
# Set our image tags that we want to build and the servercore base image
OSVERSIONS=("1809" "1903" "1909" "2004" "20H2")
BASEIIMAGE="mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:"
Next we will build and push these images, much the same as the linux images above but for brevity, I’ll create a loop…
for VERSION in ${OSVERSIONS[*]}
do
export BASEIIMAGE="mcr.microsoft.com/windows/nanoserver:$VERSION"
docker buildx build --pull --output=type=registry --platform windows/amd64 \
-t my-repo/sonobuoy:v0.20-windows-amd64-${VERSION} --build-arg BASEIMAGE=$BASEIIMAGE -f DockerfileWindows .
# Add our images to the list
MANIFESTLIST+="my-repo/sonobuoy:v0.20-windows-amd64-${VERSION} "
done
At this point my-repo should have a images for all of my Windows versions and linux Architectures but they are just a collection of tags… lets put them all together!
The docker manifest create command takes 2 arguments first is the manifest list image name and our space seperated list of all the images to include which looks like this…
my-repo/sonobuoy:v0.20-windows-amd64-1809 my-repo/sonobuoy:v0.20-windows-amd64-1903 my-repo/sonobuoy:v0.20-windows-amd64-1909 my-repo/sonobuoy:v0.20-windows-amd64-2004 my-repo/sonobuoy:v0.20-windows-amd64-20H2 my-repo/sonobuoy:v0.20-linux-arm64v8 my-repo/sonobuoy:v0.20-linux-amd64
We create our new manifest list
# We use --amend in case the manifest already exists
docker manifest create --amend my-repo/sonobuoy:v0.20 $MANIFESTLIST
Next we can annotate our linux images to let our CRI know which image to use later on. These annotations can container any of the following
Options:
--arch string Set architecture
--os string Set operating system
--os-features strings Set operating system feature
--os-version string Set operating system version
--variant string Set architecture variant
In our case we will do the following, (notice we can also set an arm64 variant)
docker manifest annotate --os linux --arch amd64 "my-repo/sonobuoy:v0.20" "my-repo/sonobuoy:v0.20-linux-amd64"
docker manifest annotate --os linux --arch arm64 --variant v8 "my-repo/sonobuoy:v0.20" "my-repo/sonobuoy:v0.20-linux-arm64v8"
Next we do the same for our windows images, making sure to add the windows “full” version, which we will extract from our base image
for VERSION in ${OSVERSIONS[*]}
do
full_version=`docker manifest inspect mcr.microsoft.com/windows/servercore:${VERSION} | grep "os.version" | head -n 1 | awk '{print $$2}' | sed 's@.*:@@' | sed 's/"//g'` || true;
docker manifest annotate --os-version ${full_version} --os windows --arch amd64 "my-repo/sonobuoy:v0.20" "my-repo/sonobuoy:v0.20-windows-amd64-${VERSION}"
done
And that’s it! Now, no matter which OS or Windows version we run the image on, we will no longer have to worry about the dreaded no matching manifest for {platform} {version} in the manifest list entries.
This is only true when you are running Process Isolated containers, hyper-v isolation can get around this ↩︎
To prevent this you can Taint your node or use nodeSelectors/RuntimeClasses ↩︎
docker manifest create
and building windows images on platorms other than Windows require an external docker registry because our docker images will not be accesible using the docker CLI, therefore we must upload them to a docker repo in order for this to work. ↩︎